Activities per year
Abstract
The ratio bias refers to decision makers' propensity to overestimate probabilities that are specified as ratios of large numbers in comparison to a ratio of smaller numbers (e.g., 9:100 vs. 1:10). To reconcile conflicting findings about this bias, we study such deviations in a more general setting allowing for deviations in both directions, irrational indifference, and inability to decide. We find that the predominant direction of deviations depends on the probabilities involved and that there is no uniform bias in favor of high numbers across all settings. Our findings indicate a strong negative impact of risk literacy on all such bias phenomena. We also test the relationship of the ratio bias to rational/experiential system theory and find that, contrary to the theoretical predictions, biased responses tend to take longer time than logically correct answers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e2263 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 4 Nov 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502052 Business administration
Keywords
- COGNITIVE REFLECTION
- DECISION
- DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES
- INFORMATION
- JUDGMENT
- NUMERACY
- OVERCONFIDENCE
- PERFORMANCE
- PROBABILITY
- RISK
- decisions under risk
- ratio bias
- rational versus experiential system
Activities
- 1 Research organization
-
Behavioral OR European Working Group (EWG - BOR) (External organisation)
Aysegül Engin (Contributor)
2022Activity: Membership › Research organization