Abstract
In the summer of 2025, private international law briefly captivated Austrian media. Two merchants had agreed that any dispute arising out of their legal relationship should be resolved by arbitration in accordance with principles of Islamic law. A dispute arose and resulted in a domestic award ordering the defendant to pay damages exceeding EUR 1,000,000. The award creditor successfully moved for enforcement. On appeal, the award debtor alleged that an application of Islamic law in arbitral proceedings violates Austrian substantive public policy. The appellate court rejected this argument, finding that the resolution of a commercial dispute under Islamic law does not upset fundamental notions of the Austrian legal system. The case caused an uproar, first in the Austrian tabloids, then in wider society, resulting in calls for banning the application of Islamic law in Austria. The Austrian government has created a working group studying the possibility of law reform in this sense. Potential clashes with EU and international law loom.
| Translated title of the contribution | Islamisches Recht in der Binnenschiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Einige Überlegungen zu einem rezenten österreichischen 'Skandal'. Entscheidungsanmerkung zu Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien, 2. Mai 2025, 47 R 65/25v und 47 R 66/25s |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 651–661 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Cuadernos de derecho transnacional |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Mar 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 505013 Private law
- 505031 Civil law
- 505032 Civil procedure law
Keywords
- Arbitration
- Islamic law
- Sharia law
- religious law
- public policy
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver