Abstract
In the past years the Netherlands have witnessed turbulent debates on immigration and integration, characterized by high levels of negativity and containing a variety of different viewpoints, i.e., frames, of the issue. We use a 4 × 2 between subjects experiment to investigate, which responses four salient immigration frames elicit among Dutch citizens. The results show that, whereas the willingness to support collective action is affected by the valence of the story, attitudes towards immigrants and intercultural behavioural intentions are affected by the frame of the story: the multicultural frame exerts positive, and the victimization frame exerts negative effects, regardless of the valence of the story.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 97-108 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | International Journal of Intercultural Relations |
| Volume | 55 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 508020 Political communication
Keywords
- experiment
- immigration
- framing
- media
- integration
- Integration
- COLOR-BLINDNESS
- Experiment
- Media
- Framing
- PRESS
- PREJUDICE
- CITIZENSHIP
- PUBLIC-OPINION
- MULTICULTURALISM
- Immigration
- PROCESSING NEWS
- CATEGORIZATION
- PERSPECTIVE-TAKING
- GROUP CUES
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'It's the frame that matters: Immigrant integration and media framing effects in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver