John the Grammarian and Photius. A Ninth-Century Byzantine Debate on Depiction, Visual Perception and Verbal Description

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

This article proposes a study of a major philosophical claim made by the great figure of the second period of Iconoclasm, John the Grammarian. According to John, since the essential properties as well as many of the accidental properties of a given individual cannot be represented in visual form, an accurate depiction of that individual is impossible. The in-depth analysis of this claim allows a re-evaluation of John’s logical culture, which turns out to be much more well developed than has been argued to date. The second part of the article defends the hypothesis that Photius’s Homily XVII is, in part, a response to the position of John the Grammarian. The question of visual perception according to Photius is also revisited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-87
Number of pages21
JournalJahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik
Volume70
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 602010 Byzantine studies
  • 603104 History of philosophy

Keywords

  • Iconoclasm
  • Individuality
  • John the Grammarian
  • Photius
  • Vision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'John the Grammarian and Photius. A Ninth-Century Byzantine Debate on Depiction, Visual Perception and Verbal Description'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this