TY - JOUR
T1 - Landslide displacement forecasting using deep learning and monitoring data across selected sites
AU - Nava, Lorenzo
AU - Carraro, Edoardo
AU - Reyes-Carmona, Cristina
AU - Puliero, Silvia
AU - Bhuyan, Kushanav
AU - Rosi, Ascanio
AU - Monserrat, Oriol
AU - Floris, Mario
AU - Meena, Sansar Raj
AU - Galve, Jorge Pedro
AU - Catani, Filippo
N1 - Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Padova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The authors wish to thank the Veneto Region and Veneto Strade for providing monitoring data and partially funding the research with the Grant “SUPPORTO SCIENTIFICO PER L’OTTIMIZZAZIONE, IMPLEMENTAZIONE E GESTIONE DEL SISTEMA DI MONITORAGGIO CON AGGIORNAMENTO DELLE SOGLIE DI ALLERTAMENTO DEL FENOMENO FRANOSO DI SANT’ANDREA – PERAROLO DI CADORE (BL)” and the Spanish Grant “SARAI, PID2020-116540RB-C21,” funded by “MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033” and “RISKCOAST” for having provided the InSAR displacement data of the El Arrecife landslide. Access to the Geohazard Exploitation Platform (GEP) of the European Space Agency (ESA) was provided by the NoR Projects Sponsorship (Project ID: 63737).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Accurate early warning systems for landslides are a reliable risk-reduction strategy that may significantly reduce fatalities and economic losses. Several machine learning methods have been examined for this purpose, underlying deep learning (DL) models’ remarkable prediction capabilities. The long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) algorithms are the sole DL model studied in the extant comparisons. However, several other DL algorithms are suitable for time series forecasting tasks. In this paper, we assess, compare, and describe seven DL methods for forecasting future landslide displacement: multi-layer perception (MLP), LSTM, GRU, 1D convolutional neural network (1D CNN), 2xLSTM, bidirectional LSTM (bi-LSTM), and an architecture composed of 1D CNN and LSTM (Conv-LSTM). The investigation focuses on four landslides with different geographic locations, geological settings, time step dimensions, and measurement instruments. Two landslides are located in an artificial reservoir context, while the displacement of the other two is influenced just by rainfall. The results reveal that the MLP, GRU, and LSTM models can make reliable predictions in all four scenarios, while the Conv-LSTM model outperforms the others in the Baishuihe landslide, where the landslide is highly seasonal. No evident performance differences were found for landslides inside artificial reservoirs rather than outside. Furthermore, the research shows that MLP is better adapted to forecast the highest displacement peaks, while LSTM and GRU are better suited to model lower displacement peaks. We believe the findings of this research will serve as a precious aid when implementing a DL-based landslide early warning system (LEWS).
AB - Accurate early warning systems for landslides are a reliable risk-reduction strategy that may significantly reduce fatalities and economic losses. Several machine learning methods have been examined for this purpose, underlying deep learning (DL) models’ remarkable prediction capabilities. The long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) algorithms are the sole DL model studied in the extant comparisons. However, several other DL algorithms are suitable for time series forecasting tasks. In this paper, we assess, compare, and describe seven DL methods for forecasting future landslide displacement: multi-layer perception (MLP), LSTM, GRU, 1D convolutional neural network (1D CNN), 2xLSTM, bidirectional LSTM (bi-LSTM), and an architecture composed of 1D CNN and LSTM (Conv-LSTM). The investigation focuses on four landslides with different geographic locations, geological settings, time step dimensions, and measurement instruments. Two landslides are located in an artificial reservoir context, while the displacement of the other two is influenced just by rainfall. The results reveal that the MLP, GRU, and LSTM models can make reliable predictions in all four scenarios, while the Conv-LSTM model outperforms the others in the Baishuihe landslide, where the landslide is highly seasonal. No evident performance differences were found for landslides inside artificial reservoirs rather than outside. Furthermore, the research shows that MLP is better adapted to forecast the highest displacement peaks, while LSTM and GRU are better suited to model lower displacement peaks. We believe the findings of this research will serve as a precious aid when implementing a DL-based landslide early warning system (LEWS).
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Landslide early warning
KW - Landslide forecasting
KW - Landslide hazard
KW - Remote sensing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163763206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10346-023-02104-9
DO - 10.1007/s10346-023-02104-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163763206
SN - 1612-510X
VL - 20
SP - 2111
EP - 2129
JO - Landslides
JF - Landslides
IS - 10
ER -