Abstract
Interlocutors tend to refer to objects using the same names as each other. We investigated whether native and non-native interlocutors’ tendency to do so is influenced by speakers’ nativeness and by their beliefs about an interlocutor's nativeness. A native or non-native participant and a native or non-native confederate directed each other around a map to deliver objects to locations. We manipulated whether confederates referred to objects using a favored or disfavored name, while controlling for confederates’ language behavior. We found evidence of audience design for native and non-native addressees: participants were more likely to use a disfavored name after a non-native confederate used that name than after a native confederate used that name; this tendency did not differ between native and non-native participants. Results suggest that both native and non-native speakers can adapt to the language of non-native partners through non-automatic, goal-directed mechanisms of alignment during cognitively demanding communicative tasks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 746-757 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Bilingualism: Language and Cognition |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 501030 Cognitive science
- 602004 General linguistics
Keywords
- ADULTS
- BOOST
- CHILDREN
- COORDINATION
- CORPUS
- ENGLISH
- INTELLIGIBILITY
- LINGUISTIC ALIGNMENT
- SPEECH
- SYNTACTIC ALIGNMENT
- audience design
- lexical alignment
- native-non-native interaction
- priming
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lexical alignment is affected by addressee but not speaker nativeness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver