Abstract
The present article is a discourse analysis of recent (2000-) mainland Chinese historiography on the Sinocentric tributary system of East Asian interstate relations during China’s Ming (1368-1644 CE) and Qing (1644-1912 CE) dynasties. The article focuses on various strands of Chinese nationalism in the discourse, classified as “rigid”/exclusionist, “soft”/cultural, and liberal. The article discusses the various roles played by these strands of nationalism in the discourse, and the possible future influences of tributary system historiography on China’s evolving self-perception as a nation-state, as well as a regional and global actor. The article argues that “soft”/cultural nationalism dominates the discourse with many authors emphasizing China’s supposed pre-modern culture of pacifist great power politics, implicitly or explicitly advocating the reference value of the topic for China’s present and future international relations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-266 |
| Journal | Comparativ: Zeitschrift für Globalgeschichte und Vergleichende Gesellschaftsforschung |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 602045 Sinology
- 601023 Global history
Keywords
- tributary system
- discourse analysis
- Chinese nationalisms
- Ming China
- Qing China
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mainland Chinese Historiography in Search of New National and Global Narratives: Analyzing Recent Historiography on the Tributary System of Interstate Relations under the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368-1912 CE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver