Mainstream Sell-Outs? How Collaboration with the Radical Right Changes Perceptions of Party Positions on Immigration

Ida Hjermitslev

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

European mainstream right parties are increasingly choosing to include radical right parties in coalition governments or other types of stable and committed cooperation. How does this cooperation affect voters’ perceptions of party positions? This article examines whether coalition signals have a significant impact on voters’ perceptions of the specific policy issues that were at stake in the bargaining process. More specifically, does the issue ownership of the radical right cause voters to perceive mainstream parties as radicalizing on immigration issues pertaining to asylum and multiculturalism? I compare the perceptions of Dutch parties before and after two coalition formations that (formally and informally) involved a radical right party: the coalition with the List Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and the support agreement with the Freedom Party in 2010. Furthermore, I examine the long-term effects of the Danish mainstream right government's reliance on the support of the radical right Danish People's Party in 2001–11.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-55
Number of pages25
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Volume57
Issue number1
Early online date3 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 506014 Comparative politics

Keywords

  • ELECTION
  • EXCLUSION
  • IMPACT
  • PARIAHS
  • VOTERS
  • coalition formation
  • external support parties
  • multiculturalism and immigration
  • party positions
  • radical right
  • voter perceptions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mainstream Sell-Outs? How Collaboration with the Radical Right Changes Perceptions of Party Positions on Immigration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this