Abstract
To mitigate the risks and maximise the opportunities arising from China’s great power behaviour, Malaysia employed a hedging strategy during Mahathir Mohamad’s second term as prime minister. From 2018 until 2020, the middle power Malaysia applied direct engagement and elements of limited balancing and limited bandwagoning in a flexible yet consistent manner. Neither China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) nor its actions in the South China Sea caused a sea change in Malaysia’s hedging strategy. Crucially, the policies towards China were embedded in omnidirectional, friendly, and well-balanced relations with the United States, Japan, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Theoretically, this contribution applies an updated concept of hedging, initially introduced by Cheng-Chwee Kuik. As an important innovation, it adds a specific component to assess the perceptions of the political leader(s) of risks and opportunities related to the hedging target as well as the strategic value of potential balancing partners.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 106-131 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Journal of Current Chinese Affairs |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Dec 2020 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 506007 International relations
Keywords
- International Relatoins
- Hedging
- Malaysia
- China
- Belt and Road Initiative
- Southeast Asia
- Mahathir Mohamad
- South China Sea
- hedging