Abstract
We investigate intertemporal strategic interactions if monopolies, cartels, or oligopolies benefit from firm internal as well as external learning by doing. Our analysis is carried out for a linear learning cost curve, which allows the derivation of the linear Markov perfect equilibrium (LMPE). The model yields surprising properties: First and highly policy-relevant is the non-existence of equilibria except for very few firms and sufficiently large spillovers, although the corresponding open loop as well as the collusive (cartel) equilibria and the monopoly solution exist. This analytical result corroborates the empirical evidence on the many bankruptcies in the solar photovoltaic market. Second, from a policy perspective, learning could justify a restriction on the number of competitors in the marketplace, in particular if it is very effective. Third, surprising and of theoretical interest is that the linear (and symmetric) Markov perfect equilibrium need not be unique, which is a novel outcome for meaningful economic models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 107347 |
| Journal | Energy Economics |
| Volume | 131 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Funding
We thank Herbert Dawid and Peter Kort as well as the participants of the Dynamic games in environmental economics and management workshop (organized by Florian Wagener) for feedback on an earlier draft of this paper. Special gratitude is extended towards Jacob Engwerda, whose expertise and input was especially valuable. Additionally, we thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and constructive feedback, which significantly contributed to the improvement of this manuscript.
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502022 Sustainable economics
- 502013 Industrial economics
- 502042 Environmental economics
Keywords
- Competition
- Differential game
- Learning by doing
- Linear Markov perfect equilibrium
- Solar PV
- Spillovers