Misunderstanding historical linguistics: three Uralic examples

Publications: Contribution to bookChapterPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Since the nineteenth century, findings of historical linguistics have been used for shedding light on the past and, in this connection, also in national identity building. This has created tensions between pre-scientific, romantic narratives and the mainstream academic views on linguistic prehistory. Somewhat surprisingly, not only laypeople but even academic “maverick” linguists sometimes propagate pseudolinguistic views seemingly tailored to support popular ideas about a glorious national past. This chapter analyzes three such cases and the reasons behind the misuse of data, methods, and terminology. While two of them seem to be mainly connected to Hungarian Anti-Finno-Ugrism, one of them represents similar problems in Finland and Estonia.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLanguage, History, Ideology
Subtitle of host publicationThe Use and Misuse of Historical-Comparative Linguistics
EditorsCamiel Hamans, Hans Henrich Hock
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages14-31
ISBN (Electronic)9780191866609
ISBN (Print)9780198827894
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 May 2024

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 602057 Historical linguistics
  • 602012 Finno-Ugrian studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Misunderstanding historical linguistics: three Uralic examples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this