TY - JOUR
T1 - Moving to Stay in (a Woman’s) Place
T2 - Was Patrilocality the Dominant Mode of Postmarital Residence across Later European Prehistory?
AU - Bickle, Penny
AU - Hofmann, Daniela
AU - Souvatzi, Stella
AU - Cintas-Peña, Marta
AU - Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina
AU - Schauer, Peter
AU - Khalil, Umair
AU - Shaw, Daniel
AU - Van Vleet, Krista E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-commercial reuse of the work with attribution. For commercial use, contact [email protected]. Rights for text and data mining and training of artificial intelligence technologies or similar technologies are reserved.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - This paper questions whether forms of female mobility and their relation to kinship were uniform throughout later European prehistory. Patrilocality has become the primary way in which sex-based differences in isotope and ancient DNA (aDNA) data are interpreted for this period, but often without discussing or differentiating this concept further. Using a meta-analysis of existing studies from the Neolithic to the Early Iron Age, we argue that scholars have collapsed kinship and residence, patrilocality and patrilineality. This has implications for how these societies are characterized, with implicit assumptions of patriarchy now underpinning many models of movement across prehistory. We argue that, while powerful, methods such as isotope and aDNA analysis provide only a partial window on what are complex patterns of social behavior. They can achieve their full potential only when contextualized within further proxies. A critical overview of the intersection of gendered mobility and kinship is used to outline alternative avenues for exploration. We present selected archaeological case studies (Neolithic Greece, the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik, Copper Age Iberia, and Early Iron Age southern Germany) to argue for the central importance of historical dynamics in understanding the diversity of practices that are currently hidden behind the label of patrilocality.
AB - This paper questions whether forms of female mobility and their relation to kinship were uniform throughout later European prehistory. Patrilocality has become the primary way in which sex-based differences in isotope and ancient DNA (aDNA) data are interpreted for this period, but often without discussing or differentiating this concept further. Using a meta-analysis of existing studies from the Neolithic to the Early Iron Age, we argue that scholars have collapsed kinship and residence, patrilocality and patrilineality. This has implications for how these societies are characterized, with implicit assumptions of patriarchy now underpinning many models of movement across prehistory. We argue that, while powerful, methods such as isotope and aDNA analysis provide only a partial window on what are complex patterns of social behavior. They can achieve their full potential only when contextualized within further proxies. A critical overview of the intersection of gendered mobility and kinship is used to outline alternative avenues for exploration. We present selected archaeological case studies (Neolithic Greece, the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik, Copper Age Iberia, and Early Iron Age southern Germany) to argue for the central importance of historical dynamics in understanding the diversity of practices that are currently hidden behind the label of patrilocality.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022845768
U2 - 10.1086/738727
DO - 10.1086/738727
M3 - Article
SN - 0011-3204
VL - 66
SP - 954
EP - 968
JO - Current Anthropology
JF - Current Anthropology
IS - 6
ER -