TY - JOUR
T1 - Music therapy for autistic people
AU - Geretsegger, Monika
AU - Fusar-Poli, Laura
AU - Elefant, Cochavit
AU - Mössler, Karin A.
AU - Vitale, Giovanni
AU - Gold, Christian
N1 - Funding Information:
Christian Gold (CG) is an Associate Editor of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Review Group, without it supporting or influencing his work on this review. He is entirely excluded from the editorial decisions and related activities concerning this review. CG is a member of the Austrian Professional Association of Music Therapists, and until 2020, worked as a health professional. CG reports a grant from the Kavli Trust for the project 'Music for Autism' (M4A), paid to NORCE Norwegian Research Centre. CG reports being involved in publications from three studies included in this review (Bieleninik 2017; Kim 2008; and Thompson 2014). He also reports publishing an invited commentary in the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health in 2019. CG reports being the PI of two studies (Bieleninik 2017, funded by the Research Council of Norway, National Institute of Health Research; and NCT04936048, funded by the Kavli Trust), as well as a statistical advisor for one study (Kim 2008, funded by Aalborg University) eligible for inclusion in this review; none of which supported or influenced his work on this review. Assessment of eligibility, extraction of data, and assessment of risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence of these three studies were performed by two independent review authors who were not involved in the studies.
Funding Information:
Service Trust, The Evelyn Trust, Cambridgeshire Music, Anglia Ruskin University; USA: Molloy College Faculty research scholarship and a collaborative research grant from the Mid-Atlantic Region of the American Music Therapy Association
Funding Information:
Funding source: National Research Foundation of Korea
Funding Information:
Cochavit Elefant received salary support from the University of Haifa during this update.
Funding Information:
Funding source(s): Fund of Incentive to Research of Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital (project no. 08006), Brazilian Research Council (CNPq)
Funding Information:
UK: National Institute for Health Research (Health Technology Assessment Programme, National Institute for Health Research grant 12/167/95), Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation National Health
Funding Information:
Research Council of Norway (grant 213844, the Clinical Research and Mental Health Programmes); POLYFON Knowledge Cluster for Music Therapy, The Grieg Academy Department of Music, University of Bergen, Norway;
Funding Information:
Monika Geretsegger, Christian Gold, and Karin A Mössler received salary support from NORCE during this update. University of Vienna, Austria Christian Gold received salary support from the University of Vienna during this update. University of Haifa, Israel
Funding Information:
We thank Margaret Anderson, Information Specialist of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group (CDPLPG), for undertaking the searches for this and the previous update, and Joanne Duffield and Sarah Davies, Managing Editors of the CDPLPG, for their kind guidance and assistance throughout the review process. We thank Xi-Jing Chen, Jinah Kim, and Eajin Yoo for their kind help in retrieving Chinese and Korean studies, respectively, and for providing support in translating them. Thanks also go to Asli Doğrul and Ayşegül Yay Pençe for translating information from Turkish studies, to Xueli Tan and Yaning Wu for translating information from Chinese studies, and to Eun Jin Nausner for translating information from Korean studies. We also thank all study authors who kindly provided additional data from their respective studies. The CRG Editorial Team are grateful to the following peer reviewers for their time and comments: Dr Catherine E Carr, Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, UK; Michelle Hintz, PsyD, MT-BC, Cadenza Center for Psychotherapy & the Arts, Hollywood, FL; Ming Yuan Low, PhD, MT-BC, Berklee College of Music, Boston, MA; and Vanessa M Young, MS, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University. The CRG Editorial Team are grateful to Anne Lethaby for copyediting this review.
Funding Information:
The American Music Therapy Association (AMTA) provided funding support for two studies (LaGasse 2014: Arthur Flagler Fultz Research Fund; Thomas 2003: Mid-Atlantic Region of the AMTA). University funding was available for two studies (Kim 2008: Aalborg University, Denmark; Thompson 2014: University of Melbourne, Australia). The Thompson 2014 study was also supported by the Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Further funding sources included the Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India, New Delhi (Bharathi 2019); the Chongquing Natural Science Foundation (Chen 2010; Chen 2013); the Chongqing Medical Specialty Construction (Chen 2013); the Fund of Incentive to
Funding Information:
Funding source(s): Arthur Flagler Fultz Research Fund of the American Music Therapy Association
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2022/5/9
Y1 - 2022/5/9
N2 - BackgroundSocial interaction and social communication are among the central areas of difficulty for autistic people. Music therapy uses music experiences and the relationships that develop through them to enable communication and expression, thus attempting to address some of the core problems of autistic people. Music therapy has been applied in autism since the early 1950s, but its availability to autistic individuals varies across countries and settings. The application of music therapy requires specialised academic and clinical training which enables therapists to tailor the intervention to the specific needs of the individual. The present version of this review on music therapy for autistic people is an update of the previous Cochrane review update published in 2014 (following the original Cochrane review published in 2006).ObjectivesTo review the effects of music therapy, or music therapy added to standard care, for autistic people.Search methodsIn August 2021, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, eleven other databases and two trials registers. We also ran citation searches, checked reference lists, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.Selection criteriaAll randomised controlled trials (RCT5), quasi-randomised trials and controlled clinical trials comparing music therapy (or music therapy alongside standard care) to 'placebo' therapy, no treatment, or standard care for people with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder were considered for inclusion.Data collection and analysisWe used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Four authors independently selected studies and extracted data from all included studies. We synthesised the results of included studies in meta-analyses. Four authors independently assessed risk of bias (RoB) of each included study using the original RoB tool as well as the certainty of evidence using GRADE.Main resultsWe included 16 new studies in this update which brought the total number of included studies to 26 (1165 participants). These studies examined the short- and medium-term effect of music therapy (intervention duration: three days to eight months) for autistic people in individual or group settings. More than half of the studies were conducted in North America or Asia. Twenty-one studies included children aged from two to 12 years. Five studies included children and adolescents, and/or young adults. Severity levels, language skills, and cognition were widely variable across studies.Measured immediately post-intervention, music therapy compared with 'placebo' therapy or standard care was more likely to positively effect global improvement (risk ratio (RR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 1.40; 8 studies, 583 participants; moderate-certainty evidence; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 11 for low-risk population, 95% CI 6 to 39; NNTB = 6 for high-risk population, 95% CI 3 to 21) and to slightly increase quality of life (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.49; 3 RCTs, 340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence, small to medium effect size). In addition, music therapy probably results in a large reduction in total autism symptom severity (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.41 to -0.24; 9 studies, 575 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No clear evidence of a difference between music therapy and comparison groups at immediately post-intervention was found for social interaction (SMD 0.26, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.57, 12 studies, 603 participants; low-certainty evidence); non-verbal communication (SMD 0.26, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.55; 7 RCTs, 192 participants; low-certainty evidence); and verbal communication (SMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.78; 8 studies, 276 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies investigated adverse events with one (36 participants) reporting no adverse events; the other study found no differences between music therapy and standard care immediately post-intervention (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 5.94; 1 study, 290 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Authors' conclusionsThe findings of this updated review provide evidence that music therapy is probably associated with an increased chance of global improvement for autistic people, likely helps them to improve total autism severity and quality of life, and probably does not increase adverse events immediately after the intervention. The certainty of the evidence was rated as 'moderate' for these four outcomes, meaning that we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. No clear evidence of a difference was found for social interaction, nonverbal communication, and verbal communication measured immediately post-intervention. For these outcomes, the certainty of the evidence was rated as 'low' or 'very low', meaning that the true effect may be substantially different from these results. Compared with earlier versions of this review, the new studies included in this update helped to increase the certainty and applicability of this review's findings through larger sample sizes, extended age groups, longer periods of intervention and inclusion of follow-up assessments, and by predominantly using validated scales measuring generalised behaviour (i.e. behaviour outside of the therapy context). This new evidence is important for autistic individuals and their families as well as for policymakers, service providers and clinicians, to help in decisions around the types and amount of intervention that should be provided and in the planning of resources. The applicability of the findings is still limited to the age groups included in the studies, and no direct conclusions can be drawn about music therapy in autistic individuals above the young adult age. More research using rigorous designs, relevant outcome measures, and longer-term follow-up periods is needed to corroborate these findings and to examine whether the effects of music therapy are enduring.
AB - BackgroundSocial interaction and social communication are among the central areas of difficulty for autistic people. Music therapy uses music experiences and the relationships that develop through them to enable communication and expression, thus attempting to address some of the core problems of autistic people. Music therapy has been applied in autism since the early 1950s, but its availability to autistic individuals varies across countries and settings. The application of music therapy requires specialised academic and clinical training which enables therapists to tailor the intervention to the specific needs of the individual. The present version of this review on music therapy for autistic people is an update of the previous Cochrane review update published in 2014 (following the original Cochrane review published in 2006).ObjectivesTo review the effects of music therapy, or music therapy added to standard care, for autistic people.Search methodsIn August 2021, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, eleven other databases and two trials registers. We also ran citation searches, checked reference lists, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.Selection criteriaAll randomised controlled trials (RCT5), quasi-randomised trials and controlled clinical trials comparing music therapy (or music therapy alongside standard care) to 'placebo' therapy, no treatment, or standard care for people with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder were considered for inclusion.Data collection and analysisWe used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Four authors independently selected studies and extracted data from all included studies. We synthesised the results of included studies in meta-analyses. Four authors independently assessed risk of bias (RoB) of each included study using the original RoB tool as well as the certainty of evidence using GRADE.Main resultsWe included 16 new studies in this update which brought the total number of included studies to 26 (1165 participants). These studies examined the short- and medium-term effect of music therapy (intervention duration: three days to eight months) for autistic people in individual or group settings. More than half of the studies were conducted in North America or Asia. Twenty-one studies included children aged from two to 12 years. Five studies included children and adolescents, and/or young adults. Severity levels, language skills, and cognition were widely variable across studies.Measured immediately post-intervention, music therapy compared with 'placebo' therapy or standard care was more likely to positively effect global improvement (risk ratio (RR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 1.40; 8 studies, 583 participants; moderate-certainty evidence; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 11 for low-risk population, 95% CI 6 to 39; NNTB = 6 for high-risk population, 95% CI 3 to 21) and to slightly increase quality of life (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.49; 3 RCTs, 340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence, small to medium effect size). In addition, music therapy probably results in a large reduction in total autism symptom severity (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.41 to -0.24; 9 studies, 575 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No clear evidence of a difference between music therapy and comparison groups at immediately post-intervention was found for social interaction (SMD 0.26, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.57, 12 studies, 603 participants; low-certainty evidence); non-verbal communication (SMD 0.26, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.55; 7 RCTs, 192 participants; low-certainty evidence); and verbal communication (SMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.78; 8 studies, 276 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies investigated adverse events with one (36 participants) reporting no adverse events; the other study found no differences between music therapy and standard care immediately post-intervention (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 5.94; 1 study, 290 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Authors' conclusionsThe findings of this updated review provide evidence that music therapy is probably associated with an increased chance of global improvement for autistic people, likely helps them to improve total autism severity and quality of life, and probably does not increase adverse events immediately after the intervention. The certainty of the evidence was rated as 'moderate' for these four outcomes, meaning that we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. No clear evidence of a difference was found for social interaction, nonverbal communication, and verbal communication measured immediately post-intervention. For these outcomes, the certainty of the evidence was rated as 'low' or 'very low', meaning that the true effect may be substantially different from these results. Compared with earlier versions of this review, the new studies included in this update helped to increase the certainty and applicability of this review's findings through larger sample sizes, extended age groups, longer periods of intervention and inclusion of follow-up assessments, and by predominantly using validated scales measuring generalised behaviour (i.e. behaviour outside of the therapy context). This new evidence is important for autistic individuals and their families as well as for policymakers, service providers and clinicians, to help in decisions around the types and amount of intervention that should be provided and in the planning of resources. The applicability of the findings is still limited to the age groups included in the studies, and no direct conclusions can be drawn about music therapy in autistic individuals above the young adult age. More research using rigorous designs, relevant outcome measures, and longer-term follow-up periods is needed to corroborate these findings and to examine whether the effects of music therapy are enduring.
KW - Autistic Disorder [rehabilitation]
KW - Child Development Disorders, Pervasive [rehabilitation]
KW - Communication
KW - Music Therapy [methods]
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Time Factors
KW - Child
KW - Humans
KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
KW - SPECTRUM DISORDER
KW - CHILDHOOD AUTISM
KW - YOUNG-CHILDREN
KW - SOCIAL-SKILLS
KW - RATING-SCALE
KW - BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST
KW - EMOTIONAL-PROBLEMS
KW - JOINT ATTENTION
KW - INDIVIDUALS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130032372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD004381.pub4
DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD004381.pub4
M3 - Review
AN - SCOPUS:85130032372
SN - 1361-6137
VL - 2022
JO - The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
JF - The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
IS - 5
M1 - CD004381
ER -