Abstract
This article develops an analytic framework composed of six narrative forms through which disruptive economic change is interpreted and legitimized. Drawing on two eventful contexts—economic recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic and ongoing climate transformations—I identify six narrative forms: redistribution, creative destruction, individual resilience, moral economy, decline for all, and growth for all. Each narrative constructs legitimacy through distinct temporal logics, visions of the state, and constructions of the social order. The analysis integrates insights from economic sociology, political sociology, and eventful theory to trace how narratives stabilize (in)equality and justify varying degrees of state intervention. The narrative forms all relate in different ways to crisis egalitarianism, the idea that disruption affects everyone equally; this interpretive tendency can legitimize postcrisis inequalities as natural or deserved. By treating narratives as eventful meaning-making devices, the framework advances a sociological understanding of legitimacy as a temporal construct.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 309-334 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Aug 2025 |
Funding
This article draws on conceptual work developed in the context of the EU Horizon Project CIDAPE – Climate, Inequality, Democratic Action, and the Force of Political Emotions. I thank colleagues involved in CIDAPE for conversations that helped shape aspects of this contribution.
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 504001 General sociology
Keywords
- crisis egalitarianism
- culture and inequality
- legitimacy
- moral economy
- temporality
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver