Abstract
This article argues that a crucial step towards a more nuanced understanding of civil society conflicts surrounding the mobility transition is the adoption of a spatial perspective, which considers the navigation of the involved levels of governance. To this end, we propose an analytical approach based on Conflict Field Analysis, the Embedded Agency Perspective, and multi-level governance theory: a multi-level analysis of spatially embedded conflicts. The aim of this article is to conduct a qualitative case study on how civil society actors engage with the multi-level governance system in the conflict over cycling conditions in Bavaria between 2017 and 2023. We identify three modes of engagement: firstly, addressing the established governance levels according to their respective competencies; secondly, challenging the allocation of decision-making powers across governance levels; and thirdly, co-creating new governance levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-34 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | European Journal of Spatial Development |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 507011 Spatial research
Keywords
- Civil society
- conflict
- multi-level governance
- spatial planning
- sustainable mobility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Next level? Civil society’s navigation of multi-level governance in the conflict over cycling conditions in Bavaria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver