Abstract
The current article is a rejoinder to “A Call for Theory to Support the Use of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos.” Our article comments on the 6 research questions raised by Hardin (2017) in his constructive commentary on our original article (i.e., “In Defense of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Minority Report”).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 605-608 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Psychological Methods |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502052 Business administration
Keywords
- HBE
- Cat1
- BWL
- causal-formative indicators
- MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE
- MODELS
- causal indicators
- reflective indicators
- effect indicators
- measurement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Notes on Measurement Theory for Causal-Formative Indicators: A Reply to Hardin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver