Observing phubbing behaviors during casual and serious conversations: Consequences for conversation quality, connectedness, and appropriateness

Anja Stevic (Corresponding author), Hanna Liftinger, Jörg Matthes

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

The present study investigated observers’ perspectives of smartphone use during social interactions in serious and casual conversational contexts, suggesting gender differences. The results of the between-subjects 2 × 2 experimental study show that female observers perceive lower conversation quality when observing phubbing than male observers, aligning with the need-threat model’s assertion of female susceptibility to social exclusion. Moreover, observing phubbing diminishes perceived appropriateness of the interaction. Interestingly, no disparity was found in casual versus serious topics of the conversations. Societal implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number170
JournalBMC Psychology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Feb 2025

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 508007 Communication science

Keywords

  • Observer perspective
  • Phubbing
  • Social interaction
  • Problematic smartphone use
  • Experimental study
  • Interrupted conversation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Observing phubbing behaviors during casual and serious conversations: Consequences for conversation quality, connectedness, and appropriateness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this