On the clock of the combinatorial clock auction

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

The combinatorial clock auction (CCA) has frequently been used in recent spectrum auctions. It combines a dynamic clock phase and a one-off supplementary round. The winning allocation and the corresponding prices are determined by the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves rules. These rules should encourage truthful bidding, whereas the clock phase is intended to reveal information. We inquire into the role of the clock when bidders have lexicographic preferences for raising rivals' costs. We show that in an efficient equilibrium, the clock cannot fully reveal bidders' types. In the spirit of the ratchet effect, in the supplementary round competitors extract surplus from strong bidders whose type is revealed. We also show that if there is substantial room for information revelation, that is, if the uncertainty about the final allocation is large, all equilibria of the CCA are inefficient. Qualitative features of our equilibria are in line with evidence concerning bidding behavior in some recent CCAs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1271-1308
Number of pages37
JournalTheoretical Economics
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 502021 Microeconomics

Keywords

  • Combinatorial auction
  • Spectrum auction
  • Spiteful bidding
  • Combinatorial auctions
  • raising rival's cost
  • DESIGN
  • spectrum auctions
  • SPECTRUM AUCTION
  • EFFICIENCY
  • ratchet effect
  • spiteful bidding
  • D44
  • D47
  • L96

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the clock of the combinatorial clock auction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this