Politics of Crisis: Threatening and Defending Journalistic Expertise—A Processual Account

Alexander Antony, Silke Steets, Michaela Pfadenhauer

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

In this article, we argue for making the frequently invoked notion of “crises of journalism” itself the proper subject of sociological analysis. Based on a case study of a public controversy over an adversarial TV interview with a well-known politician on Austria's public service broadcaster ORF, we provide an analysis of the practical use of crisis claims in metajournalistic discourse. Drawing on ethnomethodology, interactionism, and situational analysis and suggesting the discursive trajectory as an analytic tool, we show that crisis accounts serve as an instrument of politicizing journalistic expertise, i.e., as a discursive strategy of mobilizing heterogeneous actors to impose interpretations of how journalism ought to be.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-569
Number of pages29
JournalSymbolic Interaction
Volume45
Issue number4
Early online date27 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 504001 General sociology

Keywords

  • crisis claims
  • discursive trajectory
  • journalism
  • journalistic expertise
  • situational analysis
  • BOUNDARY-WORK
  • COLLAPSE
  • POWER
  • SOCIOLOGY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Politics of Crisis: Threatening and Defending Journalistic Expertise—A Processual Account'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this