Abstract
After a short introduction concerning efforts by two Pittsburgh philosophers, Robert Brandom and John McDowell, to transform analytic philosophy from a Kantian stage to a Hegelian one, I discuss two important components of Brandom’s pragmatic interpretation of Hegel. First, I thematize how
Brandom’s historical understanding of rationality leads back to a conception of praxis that regards conceptual normativity as essentially a social institution. This makes it possible to read Hegel’s idealism as pragmatic in a fundamental sense that contrasts sharply with the instrumental orientation of the classical American pragmatists. Secondly, I show how the method of Hegel’s
suspension of perspectives within absolute knowledge (in the Phenomenology of Spirit) serves as a model for Brandom’s determination of objectivity, which turns out to be a structural feature of the social and perspectival form of conceptual contents.
Brandom’s historical understanding of rationality leads back to a conception of praxis that regards conceptual normativity as essentially a social institution. This makes it possible to read Hegel’s idealism as pragmatic in a fundamental sense that contrasts sharply with the instrumental orientation of the classical American pragmatists. Secondly, I show how the method of Hegel’s
suspension of perspectives within absolute knowledge (in the Phenomenology of Spirit) serves as a model for Brandom’s determination of objectivity, which turns out to be a structural feature of the social and perspectival form of conceptual contents.
Original language | German |
---|---|
Article number | 7 |
Pages (from-to) | 162 - 178 |
Journal | Internationales Jahrbuch des deutschen Idealismus |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 603113 Philosophy