Abstract
Ecoenzyme stoichiometry (EEST) models are widely used to estimate microbial resource limitation, nutrient use efficiencies, threshold element ratios, and soil carbon sequestration potential, but uncertainties complicate their application and interpretation. For example, (1) the diagnostic enzyme activities only approximate target resource acquisition, with some enzymes involved in acquiring multiple nutrients; (2) evaluating resource availability is imprecise with neither dissolved nor bulk nutrient measurements fully representing availability to microbes; (3) microbial biomass stoichiometry may not consistently define maximum microbial growth because the stoichiometry of growing and non-growing microbes may differ; and (4) multiple environmental factors (e.g., temperature, pH, texture) simultaneously and differentially influence microbial metabolism, enzyme activities and resource availability. Based on a careful examination of the available evidence, we recommend the simultaneous evaluation of individual enzyme activities linked to the carbon (C)-, nitrogen (N)-, and phosphorus (P) cycles, together with enzyme C:N, C:P, and N:P activity ratios to better identify microbial resource limitation. Moreover, we anticipate that future research should unravel ecoenzyme induction mechanisms at the molecular level because environmental cues and resource availability strongly influence enzyme expression and thus the accuracy of EEST model predictions. To that end, parallel, high-resolution analyses of resource composition, corresponding enzyme activities, and key environmental drivers, using advanced multi-omics technologies such as metaproteomics, meta-transcriptomics, exometabolomics, and high-resolution mass spectrometry, are needed to more clearly link the mechanisms underlying process controls defining EEST models. Given the expanding use of EEST models, these considerations are timely to ensure their appropriate use and interpretation as well as maximize their potential contributions to understanding ecosystem functioning under changing environmental conditions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 110280 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Soil Biology and Biochemistry |
| Volume | 222 |
| Early online date | 1 Aug 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 Aug 2026 |
Funding
This work was funded by the Guangxi Key Research and Development Program [grant number FN2600640195], the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [grant number 2025GXNSFBA069177], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 42461009, 32001174], and the Opening Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University [grant number NO. NNNU-KLOP-X2401].
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 106022 Microbiology
- 106026 Ecosystem research
Keywords
- Ecological stoichiometry
- Limiting resources
- Metabolic efficiencies
- Microbial element limitation
- Microbial resource requirements
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver