Abstract
Mandatory and voluntary mask policies may have yet unknown social and behavioral consequences related to the effectiveness of the measure, stigmatization, and perceived fairness. Serial cross-sectional data (April 14 to May 26, 2020) from nearly 7,000 German participants demonstrate that implementing a mandatory policy increased actual compliance despite moderate acceptance; mask wearing correlated positively with other protective behaviors. A preregistered experiment (n = 925) further indicates that a voluntary policy would likely lead to insufficient compliance, would be perceived as less fair, and could intensify stigmatization. A mandatory policy appears to be an effective, fair, and socially responsible solution to curb transmissions of airborne viruses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21851-21853 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue number | 36 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Sept 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 501021 Social psychology
Keywords
- COVID-19
- face masks
- pandemic
- policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social and behavioral consequences of mask policies during the COVID-19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver