Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Space-for-Time Substitution to study changes in flowering phenology in herbaceous species is most reliable for early-flowering species

  • Anna Knapp (Corresponding author)
  • , Wolfgang Matzke
  • , Barbara Knickmann
  • , Christine Römermann
  • , Robert Rauschkolb (Corresponding author)

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Phenological events in plants are shifting worldwide in response to changes in climate. Studying long-term shifts of phenological events in plants using historical data can lead to a better understanding of processes driving phenological changes and a basis for predicting potential changes in the future. However, conducting such Time-for-Time Substitutions (TFTS), i.e., learning from the past to predict the future, remains rare due to limited availability of long-term data. An alternative method for understanding phenological change is the Space-for-Time Substitution (SFTS), in which the temporal gradient is reflected by a spatial gradient. We used historical phenological records of 17 herbaceous species from botanical gardens in Vienna covering a period of 150 years and data from 11 botanical gardens covering a spatial gradient to test the space-time equivalence. We fitted a linear-mixed effect model to test for differences between the two approaches (i.e., changes in time vs. changes in space) for analysing the associations between annual flowering onset dates and temperature. In addition, we examined the species-specific suitability of SFTS in regard to species' temporal niches. We showed that flowering advanced on average by seven days for a temperature increase of 1 °C, irrespective of the gradient considered. At the species level, however, we found that the known pattern that late-flowering species are less temperature-sensitive was not found with the SFTS dataset. The space-time equivalence was better fulfilled for early-flowering species than for late-flowering ones. This study contributes significantly to phenological research, as it demonstrated that the SFTS generally applied for herbaceous species. However, this method should always be used with caution for species-specific questions. In addition, it remains unclear to what extent the patterns found in botanical gardens are also found in less-controlled habitats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-105
Number of pages8
JournalBasic and Applied Ecology
Volume89
Early online date20 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Funding

We are very grateful to Karl Fritsch from the Austria-wide phenological observation network for their initiative to collect phenological data in Vienna. Furthermore, we would like to express our deepest gratitude to Prof. Michael Kiehn (University of Vienna) for his valuable support in bringing people together and for his advice during the development of this work. We also thank all collectors of PhenObs data and especially thank Birgit Nordt (Berlin), Isabell Hensen (Halle a.d. Saale), Martin Freiberg (Leipzig), Janin Naumann (Jena), Anja Linstädter (Potsdam), Tomáš Koubek (Prague), Manzoor Shah (Srinagar), Alexandra Kehl (Tuebingen) and Eduardo Fernández-Pascual (Gijón) for coordinating their PhenObs sites. Finally, we thank all the gardeners working in the Botanical Gardens for their continuous efforts to look after the plants. We thank the iDiv Data & Code Unit for assistance with curation and archiving of the dataset. We acknowledge support through the PhenObs network, which is funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG) via the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (FZT 118) for the support of the FlexPool project (09159715) as well as the strategic project PhenObs (09159723).

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 106008 Botany

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Flowering onset
  • Time-for-Time Substitution
  • Botanical garden

Cite this