Abstract
This contribution reviews a series of studies by Kelly (and Bock), suggesting that stress preferences of English nouns and verbs for left-hand and right-hand stress patterns are partly a result of alternating rhythm in real utterances. This claim is tested on diachronic corpus data to verify its historical implications. By using verse evidence to calibrate stress values for historical word classes, the quantitative analysis confirms that distributional asymmetries regarding strong and weak syllables in the contexts of nouns and verbs have existed at least since Late Middle English. In addition, the claim that stem-final segments predict the likelihood of right-hand stress is not only confirmed but the effect is found to be independent of etymological origin.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 452-486 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Journal of Historical Linguistics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 602008 English studies
- 602057 Historical linguistics
- 602058 Corpus linguistics
Keywords
- stress contrast
- rhythmic alternation
- Middle English
- Early Modern English
- statistical analysis
- usage-based linguistics
- Stress contrast
- Statistical analysis
- Verse evidence
- Diachronic analysis
- Rhythmic alternation
- Middle english
- Usage-based linguistics
- Early modern english