Student (Mis)Use of Generative AI Tools for University-Related Tasks

Leonhard Reiter, Moritz Jörling, Christoph Fuchs, Working group ‘Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education', Robert Böhm

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds immense potential to enhance the educational experience, its use also presents challenges. This research examines the use and misuse of AI tools for university-related tasks. We surveyed 498 students from three faculties at a large European university to, first, identify factors driving their willingness to use AI tools for university-related tasks, and, second, estimate the prevalence of cheating behavior involving the unauthorized use of AI tools in examinations. Specifically, we tested and extended the Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2) by identifying trust and perceived opportunity costs as additional determinants of using AI tools for university-related tasks. To estimate the proportion of students cheating during examinations, we applied a randomized response technique. We discuss the results with respect to the effective and appropriate implementation of AI tools in higher education. Our findings can help educators and policymakers to promote responsible AI use while mitigating its misuse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2025

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 502019 Marketing

Keywords

  • MIB
  • Artificial intelligence
  • AI
  • education
  • technology acceptance
  • TAM
  • cheating
  • AI use
  • AI misuse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Student (Mis)Use of Generative AI Tools for University-Related Tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this