The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch

  • Martin J. Head
  • , Will Steffen
  • , David Fagerlind
  • , Colin N. Waters
  • , Clement Poirier
  • , Jaia Syvitski
  • , Jan A. Zalasiewicz
  • , Anthony D. Barnosky
  • , Alejandro Cearreta
  • , Catherine Jeandel
  • , Reinhold Leinfelder
  • , J. R. McNeill
  • , Neil L. Rose
  • , Colin Summerhayes
  • , Michael Wagreich
  • , Jens Zinke

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-376
Number of pages18
JournalEpisodes: journal of international geoscience
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Funding

We thank the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, where the late Paul Crutzen worked for many years, for elucidating Nielsen's (2021a) comment that Crutzen had endorsed the results of his work. Prof. Crutzen clarified that he did notice and acknowledge but did not review or endorse the paper 'The Great Deceleration and proposed alternative interpretation'. MJH acknowledges support from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant. Simon Turner kindly supplied Figure 11. This article has benefitted from stimulating ongoing discussions with colleagues in the Anthropocene Working Group. We are most grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and to Brian Marker as Associate Editor for helpful guidance.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 105123 Stratigraphy
  • 105904 Environmental research

Keywords

  • STRATOTYPE SECTION
  • BIODIVERSITY
  • IMPACTS
  • CLIMATE
  • MARINE
  • RECORD
  • POLICY
  • FUTURE
  • POINT
  • GSSP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this