| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 359-376 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Episodes: journal of international geoscience |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Funding
We thank the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, where the late Paul Crutzen worked for many years, for elucidating Nielsen's (2021a) comment that Crutzen had endorsed the results of his work. Prof. Crutzen clarified that he did notice and acknowledge but did not review or endorse the paper 'The Great Deceleration and proposed alternative interpretation'. MJH acknowledges support from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant. Simon Turner kindly supplied Figure 11. This article has benefitted from stimulating ongoing discussions with colleagues in the Anthropocene Working Group. We are most grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and to Brian Marker as Associate Editor for helpful guidance.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 105123 Stratigraphy
- 105904 Environmental research
Keywords
- STRATOTYPE SECTION
- BIODIVERSITY
- IMPACTS
- CLIMATE
- MARINE
- RECORD
- POLICY
- FUTURE
- POINT
- GSSP
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver