Abstract
Do coders of political texts incorporate prior beliefs about parties' issue stances into their coding decisions? We report results from a coding experiment in which ten coders were each given 200 statements on immigration that were extracted from election manifestos. Party labels in these statements were randomly assigned (including a control without party cues). Coders were more likely to code a statement as pro-immigration if it was attributed to the Greens and less likely choose the anti-immigration category if it was to the populist radical right. No effect was found for mainstream parties of the center-left and center-right. The results also suggest that coders resort to party cues as heuristics when faced with ambiguous policy statements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 625-633 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Political Science Research and Methods |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 29 Sept 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2018 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 506014 Comparative politics
Keywords
- POLICY POSITIONS