The influence of tax authorities on the employment of tax practitioners: Empirical evidence from a survey and interview study

Jane Frecknall-Hughes, Katharina Gangl, Erico Kirchler, Eva Hofmann, Barbara Hartl

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Tax practitioners play a crucial role in the degree of taxpayers’ compliance – a role that has increased as tax systems worldwide have become more complex. However, little is known about tax authorities’ impact on taxpayers’ decisions to employ tax practitioners. Based on earlier research on motivations to employ a tax practitioner and the extended slippery slope framework of tax compliance, we conducted two studies which provide some answers. A survey study – comprising a representative sample of 500 Austrian self-employed taxpayers – revealed that financial gain is not the most important reason to employ a tax practitioner but instead the motivation to avoid problems with the tax authorities. Related to that, we also find that taxpayers’ perception of tax authorities wielding coercive power motivates them to employ tax practitioners. In the interview study with 33 self-employed taxpayers and 30 tax auditors, taxpayers indicated that they sought to avoid contact with tax officers by employing tax practitioners. This finding was supported by tax officers who reported preferring interaction with tax practitioners over direct contact with taxpayers. The two studies point to the complex relationship between taxpayers, tax authorities and tax practitioners, and allow the drawing of theoretical and practical implications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102629
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 501029 Economic psychology

Keywords

  • Extended slippery slope framework
  • Self-employed taxpayers
  • Tax auditors
  • Tax compliance and tax avoidance
  • Tax practitioners

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of tax authorities on the employment of tax practitioners: Empirical evidence from a survey and interview study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this