The value of blue-space recreation and perceived water quality across Europe: A contingent behaviour study

Tobias Boerger, Danny Campbell, Mathew White, Lewis R. Elliott, Lora E. Fleming, Joanne K. Garrett, Caroline Hattam, Stephen Hynes, Tuija Lankia, Tim Taylor

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

This study estimates the value of recreational visits to blue-space sites across 14 EU Member States, representing 78% of the Union's population. Across all countries surveyed, respondents made an average of 47 blue-space visits per person per year. Employing travel cost and contingent behaviour methods, the value of a visit is estimated at €41.32 which adds up to a recreational value of €631bn per year for the total adult population surveyed. Using the Bathing Water Directive's water quality designation, the analysis shows that a one-level improvement in water quality leads to 3.13 more visits (+6.67%), whereas a one-level deterioration leads to 9.77 fewer annual visits (−20.83%). This study provides valuations of benefits of recreation and changes of recreational values due to changes in surface water quality, which can be compared to the implementation and monitoring costs of efforts under the EU's Bathing Water, Water Framework and Marine Strategy Framework Directives.
Original languageEnglish
Article number145597
Number of pages13
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume771
Early online date1 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 303025 Preventive medicine

Keywords

  • Bathing water quality
  • SITE
  • Count data models
  • Blue-space recreation
  • ENDOGENOUS STRATIFICATION
  • Contingent behaviour method
  • VALUATION
  • Travel cost method
  • CHOICE
  • DEMAND
  • MODELS
  • PREFERENCES
  • TRUNCATION
  • Water quality
  • TRAVEL COST-ANALYSIS
  • BENEFITS
  • Incidental truncation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The value of blue-space recreation and perceived water quality across Europe: A contingent behaviour study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this