Abstract
Tocharian employs a number of different “agent formations” that all seem to be semantically and morphologically related. The nt-participle in B -ñca A -nt also belongs to this morphological class. From a comparative and historical point of view three things about these forms are in need of explanation: (1) The root-final palatalization of the nt-participles to thematic verbs, (2) the suffix-final palatalization in Tocharian B, and (3) the inflectional pattern with B -a and A -Ø, as in the other agent formations. I argue that the stem-final palatalization of the nt-participles in is an inner-Tocharian innovation based on analogy with the functionally related gerundives. The difference in suffix-final palatalization between B -ñca and A -nt is best explained by a morphological renewal in the history of Tocharian B that was based on a derivational variant of old *nt-participles. Finally, the ā-inflection of the Tocharian nt-participles can be compared to the inflection of present participles in NE Germanic and goes back to PIE individualizing stems in *-ō̆n-.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 53-67 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Tocharian and Indo-European Studies |
Volume | 15 |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 602017 Indo-European studies
- 602054 Comparative linguistics
- 602039 Phonology