Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research

Jan Lauwereyns (Corresponding author), Jeffrey Bajramovic, Bettina Bert, Samuel Camenzind, Joery De Kock, Alisa Elezović, Sevilay Erden, Fernando Gonzalez-Uarquin, Yesim Isil Ulman, Orsolya Ivett Hoffmann, Maria Kitsara, Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos, Winfried Neuhaus, Benoit Petit-Demouliere, Simone Pollo, Brígida Riso, Sophie Schober, Athanassia Sotiropoulos, Aurélie Thomas, Augusto VitaleDoris Wilflingseder, Arti Ahluwalia (Corresponding author)

Publications: Contribution to journalAnnotationPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Many scientific breakthroughs have depended on animal research, yet the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals in experimentation have long prompted discussions about humane treatment and responsible scientific practice. First articulated by Russell and Burch, the 3Rs Principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement have gained widespread recognition as basic guidelines for animal research. Over time, the 3Rs have transcended the research community, influencing policy decisions, animal welfare advocacy and public perception of animal experimentation. Despite their broad acceptance, interpretations of the 3Rs vary substantially, shaping statutory frameworks at various levels, with both technical and practical impacts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-350
Number of pages4
JournalLab Animal
Volume53
Issue number12
Early online date15 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 106011 3Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement of animal testing)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a common interpretation of the 3Rs principles in animal research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this