What Are Petitions Good for? Institutional Design and Democratic Functions

Sieglinde Rosenberger (Corresponding author), Benedikt Seisl, Jeremias Stadlmair, Elio Dalpra

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Parliamentary efforts to facilitate wider participation and specialised online platforms have made petition instruments more attractive and relevant, yet comparisons of petition instruments are rare. This article examines formalised (parliamentary petitions) and non-formalised petition instruments (online petitions) in Austria via a cluster analysis of actors and content of 600 petitions between 2011 and 2018. We find that, depending on the legal and institutional design, different petition instruments serve three different democratic functions: voice in parliament, link with constituents and public mobilisation. Complementing these results with insights from expert interviews with petitioners, the article provides also an understanding of how petition instruments affect petitioners’ motivations. Our findings yield a more nuanced picture of the motivations and functions of petition instruments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217–237
Number of pages21
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume75
Issue number1
Early online date30 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 506012 Political systems

Keywords

  • Austrian politics
  • linkages
  • mobilisation
  • parliament
  • participation
  • petition
  • PARTICIPATION
  • PARLIAMENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Are Petitions Good for? Institutional Design and Democratic Functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this