Where to after COVID-19? Systems thinking for a human-centred approach to pandemics

Maru Mormina, Bernhard Müller, Guido Caniglia, Eivind Engebretsen, Henriette Löffler-Stastka, James Marcum, Mathew Mercuri, Elisabeth Paul, Holger Pfaff, Federica Russo, Joachim Sturmberg, Felix Tretter (Corresponding author), Wolfram Weckwerth (Corresponding author)

Publications: Contribution to journalAnnotationPeer Reviewed

Abstract

Whilst policymaking will always remain a highly political process, especially amidst crises, evidence-based pandemic management can benefit from adopting a socioecological perspective that integrates multi- and trans-disciplinary insights: from biology, biomedicine, mathematics, statistics, social and behavioural sciences, as well as the perspectives and experiences of non-scientific stakeholders. We make a case for an “integrated inter- and transdisciplinarity” that overcomes the typical additive nature of current interdisciplinary work and better captures the inherent complexity of public health and other public policy problems. We propose systems science and systems thinking approaches as a useful meta-theoretical, self-reflecting approach for such integration to take place. Enabled by systems thinking, the praxis of “integrated inter- and transdisciplinarity” allows for an understanding of public health crises in a human-centred socio-ecological perspective. This grounds more holistic policy responses, which by mobilising the whole of government and whole of society, put individuals, groups, governments and society at large in critical dialogue to co-produce and co-design interventions that address crises in all their physical, social, psychological, economic and political dimensions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number733
JournalHumanities and Social Sciences Communications
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 303012 Health sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Where to after COVID-19? Systems thinking for a human-centred approach to pandemics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this