Abstract
Media coverage on terrorism can lead to negative attitudes toward Muslims. We theorize that undifferentiated news—i.e., not explicitly distinguishing Muslims from terrorists—can accelerate these negative effects. In a quota-based 2 (news differentiation: differentiated and undifferentiated) × 2 (expert interviewee source: Muslim and non-Muslim) between-subjects experiment (N = 291), participants read news about Islamist terrorism. A control group received news unrelated to terror. Building on the concept of news differentiation and extending this line of research, we analyzed effects on explicit and implicit attitudes toward Muslims. Drawing on social identity, self-categorization and mediated intergroup contact theories, findings revealed that undifferentiated news increased hostile attitudes toward Muslims and attitudinal undifferentiation. However, undifferentiated news did not activate implicit attitudes. We also found that undifferentiated news had the strongest negative effects when coming from sources that are perceived as similar (i.e., non-Muslim).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-124 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Mass Communication and Society |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 26 Oct 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Jan 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 508007 Communication science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who says “Muslims are not terrorists”? News differentiation, Muslim versus non-Muslim sources, and attitudes toward Muslims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver