Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests

Rosina M. Soler, Stefan Schindler, Maria V. Lencinas, Pablo L. Peri, Guillermo Martinez Pastur

Publications: Contribution to journalArticlePeer Reviewed

Abstract

Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a meta-analysis of 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retention harvesting (VR) 1-8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysis is focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, native species of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was to evaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) species richness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alien species, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supported higher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersed retention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of species affected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants of habitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants, although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insects were reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positive response to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundance compared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forest specialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects of other habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years post-harvest. Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness and abundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis shows recovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alien plants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as a main potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level. Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, but the influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-169
Number of pages9
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume369
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

  • 106003 Biodiversity research

Keywords

  • Aggregate retention
  • Biological conservation
  • Dispersed retention
  • Forest specialist species
  • Nothofagus
  • Post-harvest recovery
  • ALTERNATIVE SILVICULTURAL PRACTICES
  • NOTHOFAGUS-PUMILIO FORESTS
  • GREEN-TREE RETENTION
  • CLEAR-CUT
  • TIMBER MANAGEMENT
  • CONSERVATION
  • UNDERSTORY
  • RESPONSES
  • BOREAL
  • BIRDS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this