Abstract
Jagdish Mittal, Vijay Kumar Aggarwal and Om Prakash (O P) Jain's biographies share a major commitment: the creation of art institutions in post-independent India. Labelled as India's ‘interior designers', these collectors have reshaped the visual-material cosmos that had been profoundly altered by colonialism both at home and abroad over the centuries. Formerly colonised and white-dominated communities' collecting practices are notably absent within the existing scholarship. Crucially, their practices are not premised on the appropriation and possession of the ‘other' through imperial conquest - at the centre of a large number of studies that analyse its long-term effects. By contrast, India's ‘interior designers’ are driven by the re-possession of the self, ownership linked to the nation as well as preservation logics. This article argues that in order to decolonise the study of collecting, the epistemes governing such practices also need to be urgently foregrounded.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 262-284 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | third text |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6 Dec 2023 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 504017 Cultural anthropology
Keywords
- collecting
- decolonisation
- epistemic home rule
- gender
- India
- intersectionality
- Jagdish Mittal
- Marwari caste
- philantrophy
- private museum
- public trust
- Vijay Kumar Aggarwal and Om Prakash Jain