Abstract
We apply the Zeuthen–Hicks bargaining model in an empirical study of electronic
negotiations. Using a typology of bargaining steps based on that model, we study to what extent actual steps conform to the predictions of the model, and the effects of conformity with the model on bargaining outcomes. Results indicate that the model predicts bargaining steps only slightly better than chance, but that steps conforming to the model lead to outcomes that are closer to the efficient frontier, closer to the Nash bargaining solution, and provide higher utility to the party using such steps
negotiations. Using a typology of bargaining steps based on that model, we study to what extent actual steps conform to the predictions of the model, and the effects of conformity with the model on bargaining outcomes. Results indicate that the model predicts bargaining steps only slightly better than chance, but that steps conforming to the model lead to outcomes that are closer to the efficient frontier, closer to the Nash bargaining solution, and provide higher utility to the party using such steps
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 255-274 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Group Decision and Negotiation |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2019 |
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502052 Business administration
Keywords
- bda
- HBE
- Electronic negotiations
- Bargaining steps
- Zeuthen-Hicks bargaining
- Zeuthen–Hicks bargaining